Post in evidenza

Raped by the System: the Wadakancherry Rape Case

The prime accused in the case is a corporation councillor belonging to the CPM that is ruling the state

giovedì 28 novembre 2013

In Child Porn Crackdown, U.K.'s Internet Filter Strategy Ensnares ISPs

Revelations that late BBC TV host Jimmy Savile sexually abused hundreds of children have prompted soul searching across Britain over how his star power trumped years of suspicion. With constituents enraged, Prime Minister David Cameron has made restricting access to pornography, and especially stamping out images of children, a signature issue.
Cameron in April asked public Wi-Fi networks to filter explicit content in public settings such as coffee shops, train stations, and libraries. The six biggest providers have complied. Then in July the father of four threatened to require companies offering home Internet service to install filters that automatically block pornography; subscribers would need to “opt in” to view such material. Once again, the industry agreed; by early 2014, the filters will be on virtually all Internet accounts in Britain. Adults wanting to view explicit content will “have to have a discussion” with their spouse or partner, Cameron told BBC Radio on Nov. 18.
At a London conference that day, Google (GOOG) and Microsoft (MSFTannounced controls that limit child porn searches, initiatives Cameron threatened to enforce through legislation if not enacted voluntarily. The companies have introduced algorithms that block illegal content and have halted auto-complete on potentially abusive search terms, so typing “underage g…” doesn’t suggest the word “girl.” Google is implementing technology that brands child porn videos with a unique ID code, which will help authorities remove any copies of such material that are later reposted to the Web.
The government effort comes after reports that Savile, host of the much-loved TV show Top of the Pops for 20 years, abused children on BBC property, in hospitals, and elsewhere. Public anger escalated after two men convicted of murdering young girls in separate crimes were found to be purveyors of child porn online. Such cases, as well as Cameron’s initiatives, have boosted public awareness of the problem. Calls to a child abuse hot line run by the Internet Watch Foundation, an industry group that fights illegal porn, have climbed 40 percent in the past year.
Cameron’s strategy would be hard to replicate in other countries. In France and Germany, where nudity isn’t unusual on late-night television and in advertising, such broad restrictions might be considered overreaching. In the U.S., freedom of speech concerns would likely scuttle any broad effort to restrict access to such material. “Looking for online content is a very sensitive area, even though child porn is illegal,” says Carolyn Atwell-Davis, vice president for government affairs at the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children in Alexandria, Va.
The Index on Censorship, a London group promoting freedom of expression worldwide, says it’s studying Cameron’s measures. While restricting child pornography—which Britain also legally bans—is an admirable goal, says Padraig Reidy, a senior writer at the index, mandatory porn filters are “slightly worrying,” adding, “It should be an active choice to opt out of adult content, and the government isn’t making it so.”

In Child Porn Crackdown, U.K.'s Internet Filter Strategy Ensnares ISPs November 27, 2013


Ti piace?

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento

ShareThis

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...